This was a question posed to me on social media a few weeks ago, after my article about our mature members of Sidcup society and the fact many retirees feel trapped in their homes. After working hard for many years and buying a home for themselves and their family, the children have subsequently flown the nest and now they are left to rattle round in a big house. Many feel trapped in their big homes (hence I dubbed these Sidcup home owning mature members of our society, 'Generation Trapped').
So, should we force OAP Sidcup homeowners to downsize?
Well in the original article, I suggested that we as a society should encourage, through building, tax breaks and social acceptance that it's a good thing to downsize. But should the Government force OAP's?
Well, one of the biggest reasons OAP's move home is health (or lack of it).
Looking at the statistics for Sidcup (or DA14 and DA15 to be precise), of the 7,731 Homeowners who are 65 years and older, whilst 4,232 of them described themselves in good or very good health, a sizeable 2,537 home owning OAPs described themselves as in fair health and 962 in bad or very bad health.12.44% of Sidcup home owning OAP's are in poor health
But if you look at the figures for the whole of Bexley London Borough Council (not just Sidcup), there are only 955 specialist retirement homes that one could buy (if they were in fact for sale) and 1,306 homes available to rent from the Council and other specialist providers (again- you would be waiting for dead man's shoes to get your foot in the door) and many older homeowners wouldn't feel comfortable with the idea of renting a retirement property after enjoying the security of owning their own home for most of their adult lives.
My intuition tells me the majority 'would be' Sidcup downsizers could certainly afford to move but are staying put in bigger family homes because they can't find a suitable smaller property. The fact is there simply aren't enough bungalows for the healthy older members of the Sidcup population and specialist retirement properties for the ones who aren't in such good health … we need to build more appropriate houses in Sidcup.
The Government's Housing White Paper, published a few weeks ago, could have solved so many problems with the UK housing market, including the issue of homing our aging population. Instead, it ended up feeling annoyingly ambiguous. Forcing our older generation to move with such measures as a punitive taxation (say a tax on wasted bedrooms for people who are retired) would be the wrong thing to do. Instead of the stick – maybe the Government could use the carrot tactics and offered tax breaks for downsizers. Who knows – but something has to happen?
.. and come to think about it, isn't the word 'downsize' such an awful word? I prefer to use the word 'decent-size' instead of 'down-size'- as the other phrase feels like they are lowering themselves, as though they are having to downgrade themselves in their retirement (and let's be frank – no one likes to be downgraded).
The simple fact is we are living longer as a population and constantly growing with increased birth rates and immigration. So, what I would say to all the homeowners and property owning public of Sidcup is … more houses and apartments need to be built in the Sidcup area, especially more specialist retirement properties and bungalows. The Government had a golden opportunity with the White Paper – and were sadly found lacking.
Why not download our FREE eGuide ' How To Make Your Home Valuable And Sell Quickly':Want to know the potential Sales or Rental value of your property? – use our FREE instant Online Valuation tool to give you a guide in less than 60 secondsRead more articles: Why not read more of our articles on the Sidcup Property Blog click here
Speak to me: If you'd like to have a chat about anything in this article or property related, drop me an email at firstname.lastname@example.org – I'd love to hear from you.
Paul Long (Director & Author of The Sidcup Property Blog)